Supreme Court to decide leadership of Nigeria's African Democratic Congress amid Atiku's presidential bid
A Federal High Court ruling nullified the David Mark-led ADC leadership, threatening former Vice‑President Atiku Abubakar's candidacy. The case now heads to appellate courts, with former deputy chairman Nafiu Bala Gombe celebrating the decision and Mark’s faction preparing an appeal.
By LAS News Desk · Published 7 Nov 2026, 06:38 WAT

The African Democratic Congress (ADC) is poised for a decisive legal battle that could reshape Nigeria's opposition landscape ahead of the 2027 presidential election. Justice Peter Lifu of the Federal High Court ruled on 6 November 2026 that former Senate President David Mark’s leadership was invalid, thereby voiding all actions from his period in charge, such as the party’s selection of former Vice‑President Atiku Abubakar for the presidential race. The ruling has sent the party into fresh uncertainty, with the Mark faction announcing plans to appeal while former Deputy National Chairman, North, Nafiu Bala Gombe hailed the judgment as a victory for constitutional governance.
The dispute centres on a leadership transition that took place earlier in the year when former ADC National Chairman Ralph Nwosu facilitated the appointment of David Mark as National Chairman and former Osun State Governor Rauf Aregbesola as National Secretary. The arrangement was intended to provide a united platform for opposition figures challenging President Bola Tinubu in the 2027 election. However, Gombe contested the transition, arguing that the party’s constitution prescribed a different succession procedure that was not observed.
Background
The legal contest over ADC’s leadership has unfolded across multiple courts. In July 2026, Justice Musa Liman of the Federal High Court heard a separate suit filed by House of Representatives member Leke Abejide and upheld preliminary objections, including lack of jurisdiction and failure to exhaust internal party remedies. Liman’s judgment favoured the defendants, effectively supporting the Mark‑led leadership. The Mark camp subsequently argued that a court of coordinate jurisdiction could not overturn Liman’s decision, a point that remains unsettled.
Previously, on 30 April 2026, the Supreme Court stepped in to overturn a prior status‑quo‑ante‑bellum directive and ordered a swift trial at the Federal High Court, yet it refrained from determining the rightful head of the ADC. The recent judgment by Justice Lifu therefore represents the latest judicial pronouncement in a series of conflicting rulings, with the ultimate resolution now expected to rest with the Supreme Court.
Why it matters
The outcome of the case carries significant implications for several key political actors. Atiku Abubakar’s presidential campaign, launched in Sokoto just 24 hours before the Lifu judgment, now faces the prospect of losing its party platform if the Mark‑led leadership is deemed illegitimate. The ADC was envisioned as a coalition hub for opposition forces; its destabilisation could fragment the anti‑APC front and alter the dynamics of the 2027 election.
For David Mark and his allies, an adverse Supreme Court ruling would constitute a major setback at a critical juncture, potentially diminishing their influence within the party and the broader opposition. Conversely, Gombe’s victory in the Federal High Court reinforces his claim that the party’s constitution must be adhered to, a stance that resonates with party members concerned about procedural integrity.
The legal tussle also underscores the role of Nigeria’s judiciary in adjudicating internal party disputes, highlighting the interplay between party constitutions, the Electoral Act and the courts’ jurisdictional boundaries.
What happens next
Both factions have indicated their next steps. The Mark camp has signalled its intention to appeal the Lifu judgment to higher courts, emphasizing that the earlier Liman decision should prevail. Gombe, meanwhile, has welcomed the ruling and is likely to seek a final determination from the Supreme Court, which has already shown willingness to intervene in ADC matters. The Supreme Court’s forthcoming decision will determine whether the party’s leadership—and consequently Atiku’s candidacy—remains intact or requires restructuring before the 2027 electoral contest.
The case remains active, with the appellate process expected to unfold over the coming weeks, and the political stakes for Nigeria’s opposition coalition continuing to rise.
Sources
Spotted an error? Report a correction · Corrections policy
Related stories

ADC chieftain Imansuangbon condemns court ruling that nullifies party leadership and threatens Atiku’s ballot
Barrister Kenneth Imansuangbon of the African Democratic Congress denounced a Federal High Court judgment that voided the party’s leadership and Atiku Abubakar’s candidacy, warning it could destabilise Nigeria and urging the Court of Appeal to overturn it.
LAS News Desk · 6 Nov 2026, 23:15 WAT · 3 sources

Sokoto Court Rejects Former ADC Chairman’s Bid to Reclaim Party Leadership
A Federal High Court in Sokoto dismissed a lawsuit by former African Democratic Congress chairman Umar Faruk, ruling that the court had no jurisdiction over the party’s internal affairs and that the plaintiffs had not exhausted the party’s dispute‑resolution process.
LAS News Desk · 17 Oct 2026, 21:45 WAT · 2 sources

Federal High Court nullifies David Mark-led ADC leadership and Atiku’s presidential candidacy
A Federal High Court in Abuja has ruled that the African Democratic Congress’s leadership under former Senate President David Mark is illegal, also cancelling former Vice‑President Atiku Abubakar’s nomination for the 2027 presidential election; the decision has been denounced by the party and Atiku, who plan to appeal.
LAS News Desk · 6 Nov 2026, 04:45 WAT · 5 sources

APC urges ADC to settle leadership dispute after court nullifies Mark and Atiku nominations
The All Progressives Congress criticised former Senate President David Mark and presidential hopeful Atiku Abubakar for blaming the ruling party after a Federal High Court ruling annulled their leadership positions. The APC called on the ADC to resolve its internal crisis.
LAS News Desk · 6 Nov 2026, 21:15 WAT · 1 source

Federal High Court ruling on ADC leadership sparks alarm among Nigeria's opposition coalition
A Federal High Court decision nullifying the African Democratic Congress's leadership and presidential ticket has been condemned by the Coalition for Democracy as a threat to all opposition parties ahead of the 2027 elections, while the ADC vows to contest the poll.
LAS News Desk · 6 Nov 2026, 14:15 WAT · 11 sources

Federal High Court nullifies ADC leadership and Atiku Abubakar’s 2027 presidential candidacy
A Federal High Court in Abuja ruled that the African Democratic Congress’s leadership under David Mark was unconstitutional, striking down the party’s decisions including former Vice‑President Atiku Abubakar’s emergence as its 2027 presidential candidate. The judgment drew praise from factional chair Nafiu Bala and criticism from opposition leader Peter Obi.
LAS News Desk · 5 Nov 2026, 22:45 WAT · 7 sources
More Africa/Nigeria news ›
- FCT Minister Wike declares Rivers State will back Tinubu in 2027 election
- Tinubu urges Nigerian youths to collect PVCs ahead of 2027 elections
- Federal government halts all 2026 admissions to NTI’s NCE and degree programmes over regulatory breaches
- APC campaign chief Yari claims hardworking Nigerians can afford food despite cost-of-living crisis
- Rivers and Bayelsa governors pledge millions of votes for Tinubu in 2027 campaign